Leading lawmakers still strike the right balance on security after January 6
The architect of the Capitol said in a statement in August that he was working on a “facility needs assessment” and that he “would identify necessary security upgrades.” The agency did not respond to a recent request for comment on the status of the assessment.
More to do
Gainer said he advocated a permanent fence around the building in his day, but lawmakers have always drawn a red line, arguing it would be an ugly and unwelcome symbol. This was again the case in 2021, when lawmakers and groups invested in keeping the Capitol open to the public vocally opposed the idea.
Instead of just reacting to recent events, people should plan ahead for the next Capitol security test, Gainer said. But it can get complicated, he admitted. “The decision has to be made, what do we want the place to look like?” ” he said. “And that goes into what is sometimes a dirty term: optics.”
Late last year, Representative Rodney Davis, a senior member of the House Administration Committee, reiterated concerns he had previously expressed, saying security vulnerabilities had still not been addressed. resolved.
“We know massive changes in intelligence, perimeter protection, training, leadership structure, decision-making process and many more are needed,” he told the House, before to suggest that the Democratic-led leadership was not “interested” in ensuring the changes were made.